.
Feedback

13 Teachers, Rollingwood Principal to Lose Jobs, School Board Says

The San Bruno Park School Board took a 4-1 vote Wednesday to lay off the elementary school teachers and principal because of ongoing state budget cuts. The board also voted 4-1 to move forward with a parcel tax for November.

The San Bruno Park School Board voted 4-1 Wednesday to lay off 13 teachers next year—a sign that the school district’s budget issues are continuing to get worse.

School board members have already heard a mouthful from parents about the recent proposal to close two schools—a recommendation Superintendent David Hutt made because of declining state funding, a desire to reduce the number of combination classes and to avoid having schools with small student populations once sixth graders move to Parkside Intermediate next year.

But board members said the teacher cuts, while an unpopular decision, were necessary to keep the district financially solvent.

“It is a stage in the process,” Hutt said before the board took a vote.

If the school district gets more funding before next year, Hutt said, there is a possibility that some, if not all, of the laid off teachers could be re-hired—as has been the case in previous years.

But the outlook looks bleak at the moment.

Trustee Jennifer Blanco cast the lone dissenting vote.

What came as a surprise to a number of parents was the fact that the district had decided to include Rollingwood Elementary Principal Schrene Whitmore in the cuts for next year.

That means Rollingwood and another school will have to share a principal next year.

Some Rollingwood parents felt they were completely blindsided by that decision.

Christine Sonnenburg, a longtime kindergarten teacher at Rollingwood, said the school has had too much turnover with administrators in previous years and that the superintendent backed out of his word to prevent that turnover from happening again.

“Dr. Hutt promised that we wouldn’t lose our principal,” Sonnenburg said. “A promise is a promise.”

Parent Virna Santos said losing the school’s principal would cripple the entire neighborhood.

“I’m really disappointed that we’re going to have to share a principal,” Santos said. “On top of that, we’re going to lose teachers. Where’s your creativity to build up this community?”

Some were even more disturbed that the school district hadn’t even provided an explanation to parents as to why Whitmore, who just took over as principal this year, would lose her job.

Hutt said the school board decided at the March 14 meeting to issue what’s known as a "non-reelect letter" to Whitmore, which means her “term of service ends at the current school year.”

“It has to do with the economics of the school district as well as the fact that the school district is bringing the equivalent of a school up to Parkside,” Hutt said in an interview after the meeting.

Several Crestmoor Elementary parents also blasted Hutt for what they perceived as another personal attack on their school. They said Hutt was preventing the school from having a full kindergarten class next year by denying 11 students the ability to transfer to the school.

The school already has 19 kindergarteners enrolled, and five of the students whose families want them transferred to Crestmoor have siblings at the school. Parents said the school could have a full kindergarten class—30 students—if the school district allowed all of the transfers to go through.

Hutt denied the claim that the district was singling out Crestmoor and said none of the district's transfers have been completed for next year.

In other action, the board voted 4-1, with Blanco dissenting, to move forward with placing a parcel tax on the November ballot.

The board also began discussing whether to form a "Save Our Schools" committee to figure out how to prevent future school closures. But it still wasn't clear how that committee would work because residents said they don't want any school board members to be involved and some school board members said the committee's goals could possibly conflict with the parcel tax efforts.

A special school board meeting will be held at 7 p.m. May 16 at the to discuss several items that were tabled at Wednesday's meeting.

For more news about San Bruno, follow San Bruno Patch on Twitter and "like" us on Facebook. Got Patch in your inbox? Sign up for our newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Bruno Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Claudia Quinn April 9, 2013 at 03:42 pm
Still vote for fuel pump cafe. It used to be called carrot. Her food is fresh and delicious. AndRead More she's in San Bruno.
Steve B April 9, 2013 at 04:11 am
By all means go to big joes! The place is small but thats what keeps it Great! good old San BrunoRead More Style not many left,I have lived in san Bruno most my life and remember a lot of the places in the pictures that hang on the walls. Great place
Mike April 9, 2013 at 02:53 am
Honestly, best breakfast is 'Millbrae Lyons Pancake Breakfast' but again, thats Millbrae.
watchfultaxpayer May 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Mr, Kiely, When they cut school days, isn't the savings in that the employees who directly work withRead More and for the children are deprived of that many days of pay??? Do the principals also lose 5 days pay? Does Hutt lose 5 days pay? Do the board members lose 5 days worth of their stipend. In other words, is the bad tasting medicine swallowed by everyone in the school district in a sincere effort to cure the ills of this school district Or is it just the teachers and the classified workers who are called upon to attempt a restoral of good health, the direct result of poor management and less than admirable leadership that has brought about ths crisis??
watchfultaxpayer May 15, 2013 at 10:04 pm
Mr, Kiely, Somewhere I heard that they were considering stopping contracting out PE at a largeRead More savings. Was that discussed last week? I was not abe to stay the entire evening. I question why they would have contracted for PE at the elementary level. Isn't that what recess and the balance of lunch time was for? Physical activity??? Thank you in advance for your always knowledgeable answer to my questions.
Chris Kiely April 30, 2013 at 09:54 pm
District cutting school days? The District is showing an agreement with the union which will saveRead More $200K. It doesn't show where the money is coming from, but the amount makes it look like they are cutting 5 days from the calendar. Dr. Hutt said at the last meeting that the length of the school year was still under negotiation.
Maria Pia May 16, 2013 at 07:56 pm
Have ya seen the spiffed up American Legion building!? Thank you to the volunteers ~Read More http://www.pgecurrents.com/2013/05/02/pge-volunteers-repaint-american-legion-building-in-san-bruno/