On July 28, Rodney Corsiglia suffered a seizure while driving and , killing two cousins. Corsiglia had been knowingly driving with a permanently suspended driver’s license after the DMV told him, “You can't drive anymore - you're a danger if you do so,” according to San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe.
, severely injuring many but never having killed people before the July fatal incident in San Bruno.
Residents have expressed outrage at the man’s recklessness, demanding that Corsiglia be charged with murder. The District Attorney’s Office is pursuing murder charges.
However, other residents believe the system is “too soft,” and the man should have been punished more harshly to potentially prevent this most recent tragedy.
Do you agree that this accident could have been diverted with a stricter punishment after the first accidents? Let us know in the comments.
It's time to give this topic a rest already. I feel your playing on the victims and friends by making twists in the stories and posting silly polls. The SBPD conducted a thorough investigation, arrested the suspect and booked him into jail on murder charges. The family and their friends were not demanding murder charges because they only knew the driver had a seizure and in fact prayed for him in the same church they buried their brothers. The arrest happened under the color of darkness while everyone was asleep. The San Mateo County District Attorney's Office has a strong case on Corsiglia now and he will no doubt spend the rest of his life in prison. I encourage the family and friends to check the news periodically but not reply to ignorant post. If you need too use the media to get your message across but don't let them use you. Lastly, remember the defense also reads these posts and keeps book too.
That's one question. Then you ask, "Do you agree that this accident could have been diverted with a stricter punishment after the first accidents?" That's another separate and distinct question. And then, finally, you ask a third question, which we get to vote on, a question which is totally different from the title of this poll: "Should the County have punished Corsiglia more harshly after his previous accidents?" Worse yet, the three possible answers you give us are even more daft. It's like you're all over the place, just throwing things out there in the hope that they will stimulate discussion.
It won't change what happened. the only thing that could have prevented this would be by placing a ban on the make and model of car that the guy was driving. It would be best to just ban every vehicle that weighs in excess of 1500 pounds and isn't equipped with an emergency driver alertness detector. Just like banning assault rifles. hey .. check out this story about a Chinese teenager who murdered 8 and injured 5 more on a knife rampage. http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-teen-kills-eight-knife-attack-reports-102629246.html now THERE's someone you don't want behind the wheel. http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-teen-kills-eight-knife-attack-reports-102629246.html
I really don't think if I just lost my husband/wife I would be taking time to comment on local articles.
It's unfortunate that when the government creates/enforces rules and regulations. citizens cry foul, and when the government is not strict with punishments, citizens' bad behavior affects society negatively.
Finally, in the "poll" box: "Should the County have punished Corsiglia more harshly after his previous accidents?" (Hey, the writer re-discovered English grammar and syntax!) Maybe. See the prior paragraph. Drivers are not usually punished after traffic collisions beyond points and boosted insurance premiums--unless they’re found to be under the influence and/or impaired. Did anyone tell the DMV that Corsiglia’s accidents were possibly caused by seizures? Did anyone know?