.
Feedback

Former Bank Building Vacant for 20 Years, But Slated to Become Part of Downtown Transformation

While the building has become an eyesore, the city plans to turn it into a mixed-used development and make it into a gateway to downtown.

Sometimes you get so used to something that you almost forget it's there. That's the way it seems with the vacant bank building on the corner of Huntington and San Bruno avenues.

The salmon-colored building used to be First National Bank and has sat vacant off and on since the late 1990s.

According to Vice Mayor Rico Medina, all that is known about the building is that the city used the bank when it was open to write checks and maybe for payroll. As the story goes, the building was at one point used as headquarters for a democratic challenger to the now-deceased Congressman Tom Lantos.

Other than that, not that much seems to be known about why the building has been vacant for so long. The owner of the building, Usman Shaikh, could not be reached for comment. According to San Francisco County records, Shaikh is also the owner of Hotel Tropicana, a budget hotel on Valencia Street in the Mission district of San Francisco.

The one possibility of hope for the building lies with the city's plans to incorporate it into the downtown transit corridors plan. The plan includes a vision for turning the property into a three-story, 18,000-square-foot mixed-used development with retail stores on the ground level and homes above. Because it would be located across the street from the future Caltrain station planned to be located near San Bruno Avenue, the property could also be developed into something larger that could serve as a gateway to the downtown area.

In the meantime, Medina said, the City Council is expected to discuss plans soon for the area surrounding the former bank building to address the eyesore being created by vacant properties such as the bank building. Medina said he doesn't want to see the area neglected any longer, and he thinks the city needs to look at all options for that area because it will potentially be an important part of the downtown transformation.

"It's time," he said. "We've got to do something."

Location: 111 San Bruno Ave. West

Vacant since: late 1990s

Owner: Usman Shaikh

Assessed value of property: $1.07 million

Who to contact: Aaron Aknin, San Bruno Community Development Department director, 650-616-7039; Mark Sullivan, San Bruno housing and redevelopment manager, 650-616-7053, msullivan@ci.sanbruno.ca.us; comments can also be made by calling the city's Community Development Department at 650-616-7074.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Bruno Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Greg May 24, 2013 at 12:12 pm
Nice comments about San Bruno appreciated. I agree, it has alot going for it.
RFA May 23, 2013 at 02:20 pm
Ridiculous! Here we go with another housing crisis. The inflated prices these home are selling forRead More is going to back fire once again.
Claudia Quinn April 9, 2013 at 03:42 pm
Still vote for fuel pump cafe. It used to be called carrot. Her food is fresh and delicious. AndRead More she's in San Bruno.
Steve B April 9, 2013 at 04:11 am
By all means go to big joes! The place is small but thats what keeps it Great! good old San BrunoRead More Style not many left,I have lived in san Bruno most my life and remember a lot of the places in the pictures that hang on the walls. Great place
Mike April 9, 2013 at 02:53 am
Honestly, best breakfast is 'Millbrae Lyons Pancake Breakfast' but again, thats Millbrae.
watchfultaxpayer May 15, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Mr, Kiely, When they cut school days, isn't the savings in that the employees who directly work withRead More and for the children are deprived of that many days of pay??? Do the principals also lose 5 days pay? Does Hutt lose 5 days pay? Do the board members lose 5 days worth of their stipend. In other words, is the bad tasting medicine swallowed by everyone in the school district in a sincere effort to cure the ills of this school district Or is it just the teachers and the classified workers who are called upon to attempt a restoral of good health, the direct result of poor management and less than admirable leadership that has brought about ths crisis??
watchfultaxpayer May 15, 2013 at 10:04 pm
Mr, Kiely, Somewhere I heard that they were considering stopping contracting out PE at a largeRead More savings. Was that discussed last week? I was not abe to stay the entire evening. I question why they would have contracted for PE at the elementary level. Isn't that what recess and the balance of lunch time was for? Physical activity??? Thank you in advance for your always knowledgeable answer to my questions.
Chris Kiely April 30, 2013 at 09:54 pm
District cutting school days? The District is showing an agreement with the union which will saveRead More $200K. It doesn't show where the money is coming from, but the amount makes it look like they are cutting 5 days from the calendar. Dr. Hutt said at the last meeting that the length of the school year was still under negotiation.
Maria Pia May 16, 2013 at 07:56 pm
Have ya seen the spiffed up American Legion building!? Thank you to the volunteers ~Read More http://www.pgecurrents.com/2013/05/02/pge-volunteers-repaint-american-legion-building-in-san-bruno/