.

San Bruno Fails Tobacco Policy Test

The state of California also received failing grades from the American Lung Association.

The American Lung Association in California gave the city of San Bruno an F grade for its tobacco policies — tied for the worst of any city in San Mateo County.

The annual report, which was released Wednesday, issues grades for all cities and counties in California on local tobacco control policies including those for smokefree outdoor environments, smokefree housing, and reducing sales of tobacco products.

Overall, the association said the state of California "falls short in adequately funding tobacco prevention programs to protect children and curb tobacco-caused disease." California earned an A grade for its smokefree air policies but received a D for its low cigarette tax, an F for failing to adequately fund tobacco prevention and control programs, and another F for poor coverage of smoking cessation and treatment services.

“Cities and counties in California have always led the way with strong tobacco control policies, and that continues to this day,” said Fred Lurmann, Chair of the Leadership Board of the American Lung Association in California – Greater Bay Area. “Safeguarding our communities from the negative consequences of tobacco is critical. The low grades represent real health consequences.”

The association also criticized the state for not increasing its cigarette tax since 1999 and spending only 15 percent of what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends to adequately fund tobacco prevention programs and services to help people quit smoking.

There are about 3 million new youth smokers in the U.S. and 34,400 in California every year. About 37,000 deaths are caused by tobacco use, according to the U.S. Surgeon General.

“We need to do more to fight the influence of tobacco interests in California politics,” said American Lung Association in California Chairwoman Marsha Ramos. “Our state elected officials have an opportunity to change course in 2013 and make big strides in the fight to end tobacco-caused death and disease. It’s going to take a great deal of political will, but we are confident our elected officials are up to the challenge. Our children’s health is depending on them.”

San Mateo County State of Tobacco Control 2013 Overall Grade Smokefree Outdoor Air Smokefree Housing Reducing Sales of Tobacco Prodcuts Burlingame D D D F Hillsborough F F F F Belmont B A A F Half Moon Bay F F F F Menlo Park C B C D Millbrae F F F D Pacifica C D F A Redwood City D D F D San Bruno F F F D South San Francisco F F F D

To view the complete California report, visit www.lung.org/california.

Jim Potter January 18, 2013 at 01:04 AM
I have to question a report that gives Hillsborough an "F" for not reducing tobacco sales, when Hillsborough has no stores. All housing is single family, and there's no outside venues to attract public smoking. Are all the Burlingame hotels supposed to turn away travelers who smoke, and buy tobacco in Burlingame? My own observations of tobacco use indicates to me that smoking on the East Coast is more prevalent than it is in California. Sounds to me like the American Lung Society is not satisfied with the noticeable improvement in reducing tobacco use, when the efforts to curb tobacco use in my view, has been very successful, in consideration of how rampant smoking had been in our society for many decades prior to the 70's. I would like to see it become more successful by changing attitudes socially rather than by legislation.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something