.

Senator Hill Introduces Bill to Restore Public Access to Martin's Beach

Senator Jerry Hill
Senator Jerry Hill

Advisory - Office of Senator Jerry Hill – Monday, Feb. 10, 2014, 11 a.m., 25 Martin’s Beach Road, Half Moon Bay, CA

CONTACT: Aurelio Rojas 916-747-3199 cell; Leslie Guevarra 415-298-3404 cell

Senator Jerry Hill to Introduce Bill to Restore Public Access to Martin’s Beach Near Half Moon Bay -- the Focus of Legal Dispute Between Billionaire Owner and Coastside Residents  

Senator and Residents Will Gather Outside Gate Erected to Keep Public Out

WHAT: State Senator Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo – joined by San Mateo County Supervisor Don Horsley, members of the Surfrider Foundation, Martin’s 5, and Coastside residents – will hold a news conference announcing his legislation to reopen to the public a road that leads down to a contested beach south of Half Moon Bay.  A gate erected in 2010 by a venture capitalist who purchased the property for $37.5 million has been the focus of a nationally watched legal battle that has pitted Californians’ rights to beach access against the rights of property owners.

WHEN: Monday, Feb. 10, 2014, 11 a.m. 

 

WHERE: 25 Martin’s Beach Road, Half Moon Bay, CA

Outside the closed gate to Martin’s Beach, south of Half Moon Bay

At the intersection of Martin’s Beach Road and Highway 1/Cabrillo Highway

Note: Martin’s Beach Road intersects Highway 1 twice. The gate is at the southern intersection of Martin’s Beach Road and Highway 1. If you’re using a GPS, plug in the address: 25 Martin’s Beach Road, Half Moon Bay, CA

 

CONTACT: Aurelio Rojas 916-747-3199 cell; Leslie Guevarra 415-298-3404 cell

 

BACKGROUND:  Hill’s legislation will be introduced the day of the news conference. It will require the State Lands Commission to enter into negotiations with billionaire venture capitalist Vinod Khosla – who bought the beach property in 2008 – to purchase all or a portion of the property for a public access road. If a deal is not struck within a year, the bill would require the commission to acquire all or a portion of the property by eminent domain to create a public access road.

The property was previously owned for more than a century by the Denney family, which was charging visitors $5 for access and parking at the beach when the property was sold. But when Khosla bought the property he put up a gate with a sign that said, “Beach closed, keep out,” that angered many Coastside residents and visitors who frequented Martin’s Beach. A group of protesting surfers known as Martin’s 5 were arrested for bypassing the gate and walking down the access road to the beach and going surfing. Charges were later dropped by the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office.

Attorney Gary Redenbacher, representing Friends of Martin’s Beach, filed a lawsuit to restore public access to the beach, basing his claim on the public trust doctrine and Article 10, Section 4, of the state constitution, which prevents property owners from excluding access to public bodies of water.

But San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Gerald Buchwald ruled last October that the constitution’s provisions did not apply to Martin’s Beach because it was predated by the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which ended the Mexican War, and guaranteed that the United States would uphold the property rights of Mexican citizens.

The treaty granted 200 acres to Santa Clara Valley settler Jose Antonio Alviso, including the Martin’s Beach parcels, and Judge Buchwald ruled that the land grant took precedence over the public trust doctrine in the state constitution.

The decision – which is being appealed – doesn’t outlaw public access to the beach, but because the only way for the public to get there now is by sea, it had the same practical effect.

Meanwhile, the Surfrider Foundation, a nonprofit grassroots organization dedicated to the protection of the world’s oceans, waves and beaches, is pressing its own lawsuit against Khosla based primarily on the California Coastal Act. The case, scheduled to go to court in May, contends Khosla failed to obtain a coastal development permit for the new gate and restrictive signs that prevent the public from accessing Martin's Beach Road, in direct violation of the California Coastal Act.

###

Nate Solov

Office of Senator Jerry Hill

916-651-4013

www.senate.ca.gov/hill

  

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

A Delargo February 07, 2014 at 05:20 PM
So, rather then drive another 1/4 mile to the beach Jerry Hill wants to steal someone's land via eminent domain so people can walk down to Martins Beach ? Eminent domain is used a last resort resolving an issue of public safety or economic hardship, a standard that is certainly not met here. Thank God the land parcel carries a special legal definition that predates the Cal Coastal Commission rules. . Are there so few important issues that Jerry must hold a news conference down on highway 1 in front of gate protecting private property. There has to be better things to address then this idiotic spectacle .... Sounds like joblessness and rocketing crime rate are not enough... we need to whine by gates protecting private property !!!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »